Katherine M. Banko
Katherine M. Banko studied how rewards and performance standards affect intrinsic motivation, coauthoring research on when incentives help or hinder task interest.
Katherine M. Banko
Katherine M. Banko is a researcher whose published work examines rewards and intrinsic motivation. She earned a doctorate in psychology from the University of Alberta in 2007. Her dissertation, Increasing Intrinsic Motivation Using Rewards: The Role of the Social Context, reflects her interest in how the conditions surrounding a reward matter.
Banko coauthored a 2001 meta-analysis with Judy Cameron and W. David Pierce. They concluded that rewards did not have uniformly negative effects on intrinsic motivation: results differed with initial task interest, the form of the reward, and its connection to performance. Their conclusions differed from those of another prominent meta-analysis, making this an area of research debate rather than a settled rule that rewards either help or harm.
She also coauthored experiments on performance standards and achievement-based rewards. A 2003 study found that students offered rewards while meeting progressively more demanding puzzle-solving standards spent more time on the task afterward than students in the comparison conditions. A 2005 study reported increased subsequent task interest and time on a problem-solving activity when undergraduates received achievement-based rewards during learning or testing. These findings concern specific experimental tasks and measures, not a demonstrated method for changing workplace culture. Their practical implication is a question worth investigating—not a universal prescription: what does an incentive recognize, and how might people experience it?